KA'L YAQUTI

KA\
Serial on Life of the Prophet

Friday, November 13, 2009

13-Part Documentary on the Life of the Prophet

Filmed in Lahore, Pakistan, 2009

In April 2009 Baytunur received a grant from an individual donor to produce a documentary on the life of the Prophet. Researched, conceived and directed by the Baytunur team this documentary currently stands at the post-edit stage.









The Serial Research:

1.The Life of Muhammad, A translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Seerat Rasul Allah by A.Guillame, OUP, Karachi, 1990. [Urdu: Seerat Rasool Pak (s.a.w.) berawayat Ibn-e-Ishaq, translated by Allama Muhammad Athar Naeemi, Maktabah Nabawiyya, Lahore, H.1421]

2.The Life of Muhammad, By Muhammad Hussain Haykal, translated by Ismail Ragi A. Al-Faruqi, Darul-Ishaat, Karachi, 1999. [Urdu: Hayaat-e-Muhammad (s.a.w.) , Muhammad Hussain Haykal, Alhamd Publications, Lahore, 2007 ]

3. Muhammad, His life based on the earliest sources, Martin Lings, The Islamic Texts Society, U.K., 1991. [Urdu: Hayaat-e-Sarwar-e-Kainaat Muhammad, Martin Lings, translated by Syed Moinuddin Ahmed Qadri, Progressive Books, Lahore, 1994.]


The Serial Format: 

The total programme duration is 20 minutes shot all on location at various mosques and maqams of Lahore, Pakistan.

The format of each episode is in the broad sequence of A Narration from the life of the Prophet (on the selected topic from one particular book) given by a narrator followed by one focal point of the narration which Scholars expand and give further insight on.

The Narrators:
  1. Taimoor Khan Mumtaz, Architect, Lahore
  2. Dr. Marium Rafat, Lahore

The Scholars:
  1. Suheyl Umar, Director, Iqbal Academy Pakistan, Lahore 
  2. Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Qadri, Jamia Rizvia, Model Town, Lahore 
  3. Dr. Ejaz Akram, LUMS, Lahore 
  4. Mufti Kamaluddin Ahmed, LUMS, Lahore 
  5. Dr. Basit Koshul, LUMS, Lahore 
  6. Allama Shehzad Mujadidi, Editor Fiqh Batin, Lahore 
  7. Dr. Naumana Amjad, Punjab University 
  8. Dr. Nasir Afghan, IBA, KArachi
  9. Syed Rizwan Zamir, University of Virginia, USA

Thursday, November 12, 2009

KASHFUL MAHJUB: On Sufism

Translated by Dr. Aslam Ansari,
Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan.
Commissioned by Baytunur Trust



In Data Sahib's lifetime it seems that there was as much confusion on religious knowledge as exists today. On his student's request thereof he wrote Kashful Mahjub in order to clarify certain concepts.
Excerpt from the chapter "On Sufism - Tasawwuf":

"Allah Almighty and Exalted has said, “And there are servants of God the Compassionate who walk on the earth with humility, and when they are addressed by the illiterate (in a manner unbecoming to them) they say, “Peace (be on you)”. The Messenger of God (PBUH) has said, “Whoever heard the voice of the Sufis and does not believe in (the truth of) their prayers, is inscribed in the eye of Allah as negligent.”

In these times, however, God Almighty and Exalted has kept most of the people veiled from these people (sufis) and their affairs, and the mysteries of this persuasion have been hidden from their hearts. Hence a group of people assumed that this exercise is limited to the correction only of external aspects (of man), without inner experiences. Another group thinks that this (Sufism) is no more than a formal custom with no reality and substance. Such assumptions have been stretched to the extent that following the mockers and scholars of worldly outlook, such people have altogether denied the reality (of Sufism), and have felt happy while having been veiled from these matters. Consequently, the common people followed them, washed away their quest for purification from their inner selves, and have put away the practice of the early (Muslims) and the companions of the Prophet (PBUH).

Thence it was that Shaykhs of this path, may God have mercy on them, said, “Purity is not from amongst the attributes of man. Man indeed is clay and clay is not without impurity. For clay is nothing but impurity, and man can not walk away from impurity.” Therefore, purity cannot be exemplified by acts (afa’l), nor can human nature be destroyed by strict religious practices. Therefore, the attribute of purity related neither to acts nor to inner states; and its name is not related to nouns are honorific names. ‘Purity’ is the attribute of ‘friends’ (Sufis) and they are suns unclouded. For purity is the attributes of friends (lovers), and friend is the person who is dead in so far as his attributes are concerned; he subsists in the attributes of the Friend (God). The states of such people, in view of the people concerned with meaning, is as clear as the sun. When God’s beloved, Muhammad the chosen one (PBUH), was asked about the matter of Harith, he said, “(He is) the man whose heart Allah illumined with the light of faith. It is why his face shines like moon, and he is lustrous with the Divine light, as it has been aptly been said (verse):

“The light of the sun and the moon,
when commingled, becomes model
of the purity of love and (faith in) Unity.”"







Tuesday, September 8, 2009

The Islam Seminar: Science of Islam I
Sunday, 27th August 2008
Aiwan-e-Iqbal Complex, Lahore



Modern Science: Critique of the modern scientific method
Kamil Khan Mumtaz


PAPER OUTLINE:

Science:

- Science, ilm, literally means knowledge, but more specifically it is knowledge of the real, of nature or “the world”, the nature of reality or the reality of nature, or phenomenal existence. However, within the scientific community there are different views on the role and function of science. Two of the prevalent philosophies of science are Positivism and Realism.

o Realism: “Realists see the role of science to be to discover what the physical world is actually like.”

o Positivism: “Positivists see the role of science as being the reconciliation of observational data” not with “ontological questions (What is really there?)” [1]

- The modern scientific method is based on

o Observation;

o Logical deduction;

o Theoretical formulation and

o Experimental proof;

- The modern scientific method is premised on the following tenets:

o The world/cosmos exists;

o It is knowable;

o Bifurcation: The world is bifurcated into things that have extension: res extans, things that have concrete existence, can be measured; and things that are known: res cogitans, such as thoughts, mental images, etc. that have no concrete existence and can not be measured.

o Ratiocination: Truth is that which can be proven empirically, logically and rationally;

o Reductionism: Larger and complex entities are made up of smaller and simpler components;

- Physics

o This makes the quest for the fundamental particle the most highly prized scientific enterprise. The foremost science in this quest is physics.

o This science has led to some truly remarkable achievements and discoveries regarding the nature of the physical world. But the claim that the physical world is all there is, that there is nothing more to be known about the nature of reality or the reality of nature, is illogical and unscientific.

A practical demonstration

A small pencil mark on paper is seen as a point;

Extended in one direction it becomes a line;

Rotated around the original point it describes a circle.

Yet we will have to agree with the physicist who will point out the fact that the ink or graphite deposited on the paper is not a point, or line or circle.

Using various instruments: a tape, a scale etc. the physicist will measure the location, width, height, mass etc. of the first mark; the length of the second mark; and the area enclosed by the final shape.

Using more refined instruments the physicist will show us that the deposited material is composed of smaller particles which are composed of molecules which are composed of atoms which are composed of electrons and protons, and neutrons and so on.

Using even more refined instruments physicists have also measured the electrical charge, the momentum, spin etc. of each sub-atomic particle. Moreover, based on these measurements, the physicists have been able to calculate and predict the results of the interactions between the objects and forces within a given system with remarkable precision.

But as these physical objects, deduced logically from the instrument readings, are not perceivable by us, they have been variously described as solid spheres, as “plums in a pudding”, as orbiting planets around a sun, or as geometric and mathematical forms such as a sine curve.

These descriptions were adequate so long as they were represented in terms of perceivable objects located in an unbroken continuum of space and time. The first cracks in this Newtonian or classical paradigm of the physical universe appeared when Einstein’s theory of relativity showed that space and time are not an unbroken continuity, a universal absolute, but are relative to the observer and to the object observed. But a still more radical paradigm shift was required to explain the behavior of electrons and other sub-atomic particles as they were observed since the beginning of the last century. It appears that an electron behaves sometimes as a particle and sometimes as a wave; its position can not be predicted with certainty; it can be in two places at the same time; it jumps from one position to another without passing through any intermediate position; and finally, the act of observation collapses what is called its “state vector” so that it ceases to be the object we set out to observe;

Now quantum theory[2] deals with these strange phenomena, operating in an n-dimensional Hilbert space, and using complex numbers involving the ‘imaginary’ square root of minus one. While the sums with this quantum mathematics turn out to be extremely accurate, these (Hilbert) spaces and values of observables in terms of “state vectors” and the superposition of states etc. are impossible to visualize or represent in any imaginable form.

Nature

What does quantum theory tell us about the reality of nature or the nature of reality? For one, it is certain that the Newtonian or classical model is no longer tenable.

- Physical objects “are not so much ‘things in themselves’ as they are things in relation to specific modes of empirical enquiry.”

- Nature “is not to be conceived as a domain or ensemble made up of physical objects. To be sure, physical objects do exist; the point, however, is that these objects partake somewhat of relativity, and are to be viewed, not as so many independent entities, but as diverse manifestations of a single and unbroken reality.” [3]

- “Everything we know about Nature lies outside space-time… but generates events that can be located in space-time.”[4]

- Bell’s interconnectedness theorem: an observation, performed on photon A, seems instantly to affect photon B, traveling in opposite directions at the speed of light!

Microworld

- “Microphysical systems constitute a kind of potency in relation to the actual world… an intermediary position between non-existence and actuality, and in this respect are reminiscent of the so-called Aristotelian potentiae.”[5]

- Microphysical system “is not in reality a ‘thing or fact’, but rather a potency, a kind of potentiae.”[6]

Hylomorphic Paradigm

- Hyle receives morphe, receives content – receives being, in fact; … in itself it is amorphous, empty, and indeed non-existent.

- Morphe has no concrete existence either. The morphe of an existent entity is precisely its knowable aspect. … its essence (esse, ‘to be’)

- Tertium Quid:

Back to our Practical Demonstration

Hierarchy of Existence

- Archetypal Form

- Corporeal Object

- Physical Object

- Subjective form

-

Determination

- “transition from the possible to the actual – or from potency to manifestation – entails invariably an act of determination”

- Euclidean geometry: the Euclidean “plane as such is void; … a mere potency, in which nothing has yet been actualized. And then one constructs a point or a line … these determinations can not actually be made on rational grounds …”

Epistemology

- Modern Science is an excellent tool for dealing with the physical world. It tells us how much, where, etc. a physical object is, but does not tell us “What” it is, and how we know that it is there, out there, as an objective reality.

- We gain knowledge of the real, of nature etc. through sensory perception; logical deduction; and intellection.

o sensory perception: we experience our surroundings, the phenomenal or corporeal world, through our organs of sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch.

o logical deduction: we are able to relate specific and particular experiences to formulate conceptions in the mind through the faculty of logical and rational thought. This is a mode of operation central to the “scientific” method.

o Intellection: sensory perception and logical deduction are subjective processes of the body’s neural system and mind. The act of knowing, the process of “reading” the bits of data received by the senses is not as simple as it might appear. There is significant debate about what we perceive through the senses: do we perceive images in the mind, or do we actually perceive the objective reality “out there”? Traditionally, it is understood that the act of knowing is accomplished by the intellect, as distinct from the mind.

Hierarchy of the “Real”

- the Real: the totality of everything that exists. What we know, what is known, what can be known about anything is only, can only be a partial reality. There is a hierarchy of the absolutely real; the relatively absolute and the relative reality: what exists, what is knowable and what is known. The Real and its manifestation or presentation.

- Manifestation

o Corporeal: directly perceivable objective world that is known “through” the senses.

o Physical: the quantifiable, measured world that is observed through instruments and conceived known through logical deduction

Representation:

A concept of the real, or an aspect or presentation of the real can be represented and communicated through:

- Image

- Symbol

- Metaphor

- Allegory

- Simile

- Abstraction

o Geometry

o Mathematics/mathematical form

Traditional sciences

- Traditional sciences are based on a creationist world view - in which the cosmos is viewed as a creation and manifestation of a higher reality –, and the belief that the higher realities can be known through contemplation of the manifested realities:

o Essence/Being/The Real

o Quality and Quantity: The answer to the question “How much or how many” does not tell us “what” a thing is, only its extent in time and space. What a thing is essentially, its essence, its quiddity, is manifested by its form, its qualities.

Islam

- submission

o to the will of God: Allah, al Haq, the Highest Reality

o Abdiat, submission of the “slave”

o Khalifatullah the vicegerent, agent

- science: knowledge of the Highest Reality as a pre-requisite to submission

o The Qur’an tells us to invoke Him by his attributes. “to Allah belong the most beautiful names, so invoke him by these names” (7.180). To worship is to glorify, to adore, to praise. The qualities of every artifact reflect the qualities of its maker. The Qur’an tells us that “He is the possessor of the most beautiful names: the creator, the originator, the evolver, the bestower of forms. Everything that is in the heavens and the earth glorifies/worships/praises the Lord” (59.24)

- Contemplation:

o of phenomena/manifestation/corporeal reality. Seek the face of your Lord in the mountains, the clouds, the seas and within yourself.

o The Akhwan al-Safa, or the Brotherhood of Purity was a group of “anonymous scholars in the fourth/tenth century who produced a compendium of the arts and sciences in fifty-two epistles. This they published for all to read and it contained a virtual condensation of all knowledge of the time. They placed the science of numbers at the root of all the sciences, ‘…the foundation of wisdom, the source of knowledge and pillar of meaning.’[7]

§ “Know, brother, that the Creator, most exalted, created as the first thing from His light of unity the simple substance [al-jawhar as basit] called the Active Intellect [‘aql] – as 2 is generated from one by repetition. Then the Universal Soul was generated from the light of the Intellect as 3 is generated by adding unity to 2. Then the hyle was generated by the motion of the Soul as 4 is generated by adding unity to 3.”[8]

§ “Know, oh brother … that the study of sensible geometry leads to skill in all the practical arts, while the study of intelligible geometry leads to skill in the intellectual arts because this science is one of the gates through which we move to the knowledge of the essence of the soul, and that is the root of all knowledge …”[9]


[1] Polkinghorne, John. “Quantum Theory – a very short introduction”, OUP, Karachi, 2007, pp 82.

[2] See Polkinghorne, John, “Quantum Theory – a very short Introduction”, OUP, Karachi, 2007.

[3] Ibid, p. 77

[4] Henty Stapp, “Are Superluminal Connections Necessary?”, Nuovo Cimento, vol. 40 B (1977), p191

[5] Smith, Wolfgang, “The Quantum Enigma”, Suhail Academy, Lahore, 2005. p 62.

[6] Ibid, p 65.

[7] Ibid, p 42

[8] Ibid, p 104

[9] Ibid, p 7

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Religion & Culture: Contours of the Debate

6th Islam Seminar
The Religion & Culture Debate
Aiwan-e-Iqbal Complex, Lahore
15th August 2009


Religion & Culture: Reflections
Dr. Ejaz Akram

[Do not cite or reproduce from the following paper without permission of author]


Introduction: The Intellectual Rediscovery of a Heirarchical Relationship

In the modern systems of knowledge both religion and culture look at each other and try to define the other. The fields of Cultural Studies and Religious Studies are often taken as legitimate equals of each other without any reference to their ontological status in the grand scheme of things. This has caused considerable confusion. In order to understand the relation of culture with religion one should define both and demarcate a working definition that would allow one to see for what they are individually and how they relate to and interplay with each other. This paper is a minor philosophical endeavor to see things in their due places within hierarchies that exist but may be less and less visible to the modern mind. This paper vies to define culture and religion from both modern and traditional standpoints in order to discover the locus of confusion. After the intellectual rediscovery of a proper hierarchical relationship, we look at some of the problems that have beset the Muslim world due to interplay of religion and culture.

1. Defining Religion:

Defining religion is nearly not as problematic as defining culture. In English language, the word religion entered in it from Latin in eleventh or twelfth centuries which originates from its root to ‘relig(āre)’ which means to tie, fasten or bind, i.e., religion is that which ties man to God.[1] All religions have some concept of Divinity, a story of origin and most religions also inform the humans of the anticipation of the end of the world. Religions tend to explain the riddles of life when reason and rationality alone fail to deliver and give meaning to life. Thus it is no surprise that religion is defined as “a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs”.[2] For believers, the author of religious beliefs is God who is at once the Alpha and Omega of all things. Tao Te Ching says: “Tao begets One; one begets two; two begets three; three begets all things. All things are backed by yin and faced by yang, and harmonized by the Immaterial Breath (ch’i)”.[3] For believers, the source of religion is God and if God is transcendent, the source of religion can be said to outside of the confines of time and space.

2. Defining Culture:

Many Definitions

Culture has many definitions. Before talking about its common usage it may be proper to look at the word in itself, its original meaning, its transformation, and then look at its connotations which exist in its contemporary usage.

The word culture came into Middle English from its Latin root cultūra, which means to cultivate or till.[4] This concept has permeated over history into different fields of knowledge.

In biological sciences it implies the cultivation of microorganisms. In medicine it means to introduce (living material) into a ‘culture’ medium. Its extension in agriculture refers to the breeding of animals or growing of plants, especially to produce improved stock.[5] In this sense it is apparent that culture refers to a medium in which some kind of growth and mushrooming is taking place in an organic environment that is biophysically alive.

Defining Culture: The Domain of the Social Sciences in Modern Universities

The transposition of this concept into humanities and social sciences took place with the advent of modern social sciences in the modern universities.[6] Out of the many social sciences that exist today sociology and anthropology have contributed the defining culture the most, not to suggest that philosophy and religion have not attempted to do so, however, modern philosophy seems to have willfully abdicated that domain to the social sciences:

“The word may be used in a wide sense to describe all aspects characteristic of a particular form of human life, or in a narrow sense to denote only the system of values implicit in it. Understanding culture in the wide sense is one typical concern of historical, anthropological, and sociological studies. The study of culture in the narrow sense is the province of humanities, whose aim is to interpret and transmit to future generations the system of values in terms of which participants in a form of life find meaning and purpose”.[7]

Cultural anthropology takes as its special province the analysis of the culture of human societies. This term is used mainly in anthropology, to denote established patterns of behavior and belief. It refers both to the routines of daily life and to the distinctive features which marks off one culture from another.[8]

Modernism: Secular & Relativistic Knowledge

With the advent of modernism knowledge gradually became secular and of necessity relativistic. Just as in the modern university the department of computer science, accounting or economics stand on par with philosophy and metaphysics, one culture seems to stands on par with another one making a normative and value judgment rather difficult because:

“… different societies or cultures are analyzed objectively without using the values of one culture to judge the worth of another. A favored way of achieving this aim is to describe the practices of a society from the point of view of its members. The method is one of the hallmarks of ‘modern’ anthropology in contrast to the ethnocentrism of 19th century anthropology. A more commonsense meaning is that beliefs are relative to a particular society and are not comparable between societies”.[9]

In modernity there seems to be no higher and fixed standard available in relation to which one can judge and pass a value judgment on other entities. All seem equal in their own rite. In short there is a crisis of normative standard when approaching the subject of culture. The field of modern anthropology understands that human behavior is culturally and not genetically constituted, which has also led to debates about cultural diffusion and the uniqueness of cultures and cultural relativity.[10]

When studying Islamic cultures for example, one encounters the problem whether there is an Islamic culture as such or not. A hierarchical understanding of how culture can be conceived would purport that “if we consider the spiritual and intellectual elements which determine the life of a traditional society, and define culture as to embrace these basic elements, then without doubt there is a single Islamic culture with distinct ‘zones’ or worlds contained within it, ‘worlds’ which are united by spirit and sacred form of the tradition and separated by local ethnic, linguistic, geographical and other factors”.[11]

Modern worldview, which either denies or relegates things such as ‘sacred’ and ‘spirit’ is fragmentary in its approach. Because of its epistemology it is in a habit of focusing on parts while obscuring the whole. The term ‘culture’ is a word of recent origin in the Islamic world and its usage happens to be under direct influence of its usage in the modern Western world,[12] and therefore has a divisive impact on the identity of many Muslim groups.

In the human social realm, culture is described as the sum total of ways of living built up by a group of human beings and transmitted from one generation to another; it endeavors to study the behaviors and beliefs characteristic of a particular social, ethnic, religious or age group.[13] Collectively it means that it is a particular ‘form’ of spiritual, intellectual and material advancement in civilizations[14], as that of a certain nation or period. Individually, ‘culture’ or ‘cultured’ can mean that which (or who) is excellent in the arts and manners, exact opposite of which would mean savage and uncouth. Modern sociologists and anthropologists use ‘culture’ as a collective noun for the symbolic and learned, non-biological aspects of human society, including language, custom and convention, by which human behavior can be distinguished from that of other primates.

A Working Definition…

Keeping in mind a superfluity of definitions that exist in humanities and social sciences, our working definition must be trans-behavioral and conducive to the study of religion and culture. In the light of above discussion it is our observation (one that is commonly accepted by modern sociologists and anthropologists) that culture is a medium.

In life of human beings this medium assumes a distinct form that is distinguishable from other such forms that other humans may have produced elsewhere. In how we speak (language), geography of cultural domicile, historical consciousness, all impart certain traits from which that culture becomes distinguishable from other cultures. But most of all, belief systems of cultures are informed by religion.

Since it is a medium, it is not only a site of growth but especially communication that is transmitted from generation to generation. Our ways of thinking, acting and outward behavior is linked to our motivations, desires and intentions are culturally conditioned.

The former is visible to senses but the latter is not, yet our motivations, desires and intentions constitute a part of our cultural moorings that inform the outward behavior that are observable. Beliefs in this sense are more crucial for the study of culture than behavior alone.

A Definition of Culture

Hence, in the light of the above I would like to present a definition of culture as “a realm of shared beliefs, ideas and symbols”. Inasmuch as culture is a medium between human beings, it also plays the part of binding individuals together, or that which binds humans with other humans. Non-material and higher aspects of cultures promote unity and cohesiveness in and across cultures, while the material side of culture such as geography and ethnicity often cause fragmentation.

3. Religion AND Culture:

Traditional & Modern Culture: Proximity & Distance from God

Traditional cultures are by and large religious cultures. It may be possible to find anti-religious or agnostic people and even small scale intellectual movements in the traditional world, but ultimate legitimacy of things in traditional cultures has always come from religion. Modern culture and cultures are exceptional in a sense that for the first time in human history they have managed to produce a secular ‘culture’ whose referent is not God and whose legitimacy comes not from proximity but distance from God. In a worldview that either denies the existence of God or relegates references to God as a backward form of human consciousness, it becomes possible to assert that all human behavior is socially and culturally determined, and culture alone is upheld to be the producer of the values it lives by.

Culture as a medium

Traditionally only religion has had the right to know cultures, inform the medium of culture of religious truth and want to see cultures as a reflection of itself. Only in modern times culture has equipped itself to look at not only itself but also religion. In that sense, it would be safe to assert that religious humans have a say on matters of culture while culture lacked the ability to do the same. This is because culture is a medium, it will carry in itself whatever one puts in it and people will only transmit across generations that which is of value, that what brings happiness, felicity, peace, and that which avoids pain, suffering and anguish. For the traditional man, it is religion that accomplishes the above and for the modern man, it is often the absence of religion that supposedly accomplishes that.

Religions views culture as its repository

Religion views culture as its repository. The ultimate source of religion is God, and God is out of the confines of time and space. The humans on the other hand are bound by time and space. The law, ethics, morality and rituals of religion are meant for those that live in the human abode. God is above humans and God’s knowledge seeks to inform the way people live in their earthly abode. In this sense, religion seeks to inform culture with perennial principles that are a key to leading a good life. Religions thus leave their imprints on human cultures. History of humanity is also a history of religions. There is nothing in the world that has nothing to do with religion. Religions have always sought to guide humanity towards cultivating cultures that uphold ‘thou must not kill’ and ‘thou must not deceive’. World religions always seek to regulate human behavior so that there is peace among humans.

…then Religion is ontologically above culture

If religion is that which binds man to God and culture is that which binds fellow humans together, then religion is ontologically above culture. In religious worldview, the marriage of religion and culture would be like the marriage of Heavens and Earth or the marriage of man and woman. The former representing the absolute and active principle while the latter is the reflection of the former as a receptacle:

“A traditional civilization, such as that of Islam, is dominated by a Divine Norm, by a ‘presiding Idea’ which leaves its profoundest imprint upon its earthly receptacles; yet each receptacle is given the freedom to develop its own innate possibilities within the tradition into which it is integrated and hence to give birth to a particular ‘world’ or ‘zone’ within the general matrix of the tradition in question”.[15]

Traditional religion views traditional cultures as its repository. Modern religion (different types of fundamentalisms, especially revisionist Islam in its salafi form) are uncomfortable with the concept of culture because in its worldview religion should be pure and pristine while culture is seen as a polluting agent that has corrupted religion. In the Islamic tradition, Muslim scholars have viewed traditional cultures with the terminology of ‘urf.[16] Ibn Khaldun, the famous 14th century philosopher calls the study of societies (and their cultures) ilm al umran.[17] In the Islamic philosophic tradition, the relationship between traditional religion and traditional cultures was a symbiotic one in which ‘urf was informally considered by many doctors of law as a legitimate source of Islamic law.

4. Can ‘Urf accommodate Cultural Modernism?

The word ‘urf in Arabic means human customs, conventions, practices and social habits.[18] It comes from the same root word as irfan or ilm al ma’arifa which implies higher and Gnostic knowledge. In today’s day and age, many modernist reformers have furthered the argument that if Muslims of the traditional age could accommodate the local customs and practices and used them in Islamic law, why can we not do the same in the modern period in which we take what is good in modernity and leave the rest beside? This would appear to be a rational and reasonable argument on surface, but on closer inspection the argument may not seem to hold ground. The argument could hold ground if urf to be considered was from traditional Christian West and not from the contemporary modern West.

Modernism: Religion a fundamental problem in the path of progress

It is important to note as mentioned above, that upon the arrival of Islam the traditional cultures bore an imprint of other traditional religions that came before Islam. For example, when Islam came to India, the Indian culture(s) were already informed by the primordial Truth upon which Hinduism was based. It was possible for the Muslim Sufis and Hindu Rishis to sit together and discover a common denominator of God, albeit with different names, theological discourse and language of cosmological doctrines. Nonetheless, a culture of love and fear of God was mutually comprehensible. Or for that matter, the same exercise with Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians or Buddhists was also possible. Is such a thing possible with cultures of modernisms that Islam comes across on a daily basis in the modern world? Perhaps not. Modernism doesn’t view religion on par with itself, rather considers it a fundamental problem in the path of progress and equates it with superstition. Cultures inspired or contaminated with modernism in our opinion do not deem fit to be borrowed from. Since tradition is far from being dead, it is still possible to continue using ‘urf as a source of law from those cultural practices and customs whose origins are pegged in a revealed tradition. The same cannot be done with modernism. It is exigent therefore that the fuquha (legal doctors of Islam) understand the modern historical transformation in its philosophy, sciences and worldview. Only then will it be apparent to them why we cannot use ‘urf as a source of law to reform the precious body of Islamic principles and Shariah. The concern of the modernists is different from traditional scholars of Islam because it is the modernists who stress the need for a Protestant style reformation so that the Muslim world can emerge out of darkness and superstition and embark upon the path of modernity and progress. It is for this instrumental reason that ‘urf is being stressed by them at this point in time:

“The modernists never tire of speaking of nearly every form of activity in the Islamic world as renaissance, whose Arabic translation, al-nahda, has become such a prevalent word in contemporary Arabic literature. There is something insidious about the carefree use of this word, for it recalls the Renaissance in the West and the re-birth of certain elements of Graeco-Roman paganism, deadly from the spiritual point of view—not the positive elements of this ancient tradition which had already been integrated into Christianity by the Church Fathers”.[19]

5. Religion in the Eyes of Cultural Modernism:

Now lets look at how modern view of cultural studies looks at religion. For a brief moment, it is necessary to pause and look at the world we live in for one sees everything in the light of one’s beliefs and values. Modern world systems and international norms are secular in orientation. The origins of modernity[20] were also the origins of secularism[21]. In the religious worldview the world appears different and often diametrically opposite to non-religious or anti-religious perspectives. In order to achieve a minimal level of clarity it is important to make a dualistic distinction so that our argument stays parsimonious and comprehensible to the non-scientific and lay audience.

The story of origin of modernism, which is built on the denial of religion and on the cadaver of European Christianity, looks at human beings from the point of view of the theory of evolution. Modern philosophical argues that:

“Culture may be thought of as a causal agent that affects evolutionary process by uniquely human means. For it permits the self-conscious evaluation of human possibilities in the light of a system of values that reflect prevailing ideals about what human life ought to be. Culture is thus an indispensable device for increasing human control over the direction in which our species changes”.[22]

Since the theory of evolution denies a sacred and Divine origin of the world, its view of culture is purely terrestrial which does not take into account transcendental realities. If one denies the absolute one stays forever trapped in relativism. In the field of Cultural Studies it has meant cultural relativism in theory and in reality, but it has also led to cultural absolutism from the West, which due to its political and economic power, is strangling cultures of several traditional civilizations. This first happened inside the West itself and subsequently with the rest of the world. P. Bourdieu introduced the concept of cultural reproduction in which the dominant powers sees the function of the educational system as being to reproduce the culture of the dominant classes, thus helping to ensure their continued dominance.[23] This is exactly what the modern West is doing today. The West is missionary about spreading secularism in the world. They lay the blame on religion when religious people cause violence while condoning the secular values when non-religious people cause violence. On the one hand they speak of cultural relativity and on the other they practice cultural absolutism around the world. Modern cultures have a special proclivity towards war. The modern period between 1740 to the present as a cultural period of industrialism related to total war:

“This triumph is primarily responsible for the gradual transformation of a subject of an empire into a citizen soldier whose worldview is evolutionist and who has a mechanical conception of nature. It is the triumph of scientific materialism that has contributed to the destructive power of arms, the growth in the destructive powers of society, the gradual weakening of moral and aesthetic values, a decline of intellectuality, and a cult of violence leading eventually to a state of total war”.[24]

6. Culture of Peace is the Culture of God:

The word peace in Middle English comes from the Latin root ‘pes’ which is also a root word for peace in French ‘pais’ from where word ‘pact’ also emerges. Its parallel to what we call in Arabic ‘aman’ which has a connection with amanah that give off meanings of trust and pact, the antonyms of which are discord and disunity.[25] These words symbolize the cessation of conflict and treat the concept of peace outwardly. The dictionary describes the outward peace by words such as: accord, reconciliation, order and truce. It is interesting to note that the words that describe the outward peace are all those that suggest that a contentious, warlike situation of insecurity existed before but has now returned to a situation of normalcy. However, it is important to note that peace does not mean the mere absence of war.

The attributes of inwardly peace are lexically described through the words such as: contentment, harmony, repose, tranquility, rest, silence and beatitude, whose antonyms are agitation, anger, madness, restlessness, storminess, terror, turbulence and violence.[26]

Outward peace is necessary for a normal life, but it is the inward peace which ultimately produces the outward one; and it is the lack of inward peace that ultimately perturbs the outward peace whose extreme manifestation is war.

It is ironic to note that the cultures of the modern world and their short history can be quite adequately characterized by political agitation, a condition of anger and restlessness, while the state of terror and violence push the world toward more turbulence. Modern political culture, modern economics and their concomitant social systems have produced anything but peace. Traditional cultures by contrast, also witnessed war and strife, after all these things are a predicament of terrestrial existence, but the frequency and intensity of war and insecurity was much less than that of the modern world as documented by many scholars of war. The modern world system has ushered forth an epoch of incessant wars and civil strife, not to name the disruption of human ecology (which was more or less intact in the traditional world) and now threatens our collective existence and harmonious ways of living.[27] While the world politics and economics of the modern world have shaped the military-industrial complex that routinely overruns already oppressed peoples of the world, it is equally disruptive of its own populations inside itself. The modern urban domicile is gradually becoming uglier, giving birth to a culture of hysteria and paranoia where inner peace of its inhabitants is gradually evaporating to a point where even the so-called pacifist societies may not be peaceful to live in anymore.

The secular order that came in full force in the cold war period on both sides of the iron curtain, put humanity on a path where God became unfashionable, along with the importance of God’s fear, love and knowledge. One who doesn’t fear God can do anything. If we kill God, everything becomes possible. Western imperialism and colonialism were nothing but an outward projection of an inward mindset where men swapped sacred principles of human living for profane and secular ones.

To resuscitate the culture of peace, one must understand and accept the importance of the culture of God. God is Peace. One of the 99 beautiful Names of God (al-Asma’ al-Hasna) is al-Salaam, which means peace. The more of God one has in one’s life, the more peaceful one is, and one ‘gives off’ or radiates more peace and tranquility to others around oneself. By having more of God in oneself, we mean that one follows the injunctions and exhortations of the sacred texts of the revealed religions in an attempt to develop fear, love and knowledge of God, for one who has the fear, love and knowledge of God can in principle be only peaceful.

Muslims' struggle for Islam is also Their Struggle to Preserve their Cultures

All religions are first and foremost traditions. There is nothing intrinsically modern about religion. Like the institution of family, religion is also a traditional institution. Out of all living religions, Muslims are still arguably closest to their religion and constitute the last remaining frontier that modernism vies to engulf and dissolve. The Muslims’ struggle for Islam is also their struggle to preserve their cultures as receptacles of Divine words. According to S. H. Nasr:

“Islamic culture displays an undeniable unity which is the result of the spirit and form of the Islamic revelation and ultimately of Divine Unity itself. In the same way that the whole created order is the theophanic reflection of the One in the mirror of multiplicity, so are the various ‘faces’ of Islamic culture so many human echoes of the one Message which is itself beyond the human and which alone bestows upon the activity of a human collectivity the purposes and values which make it worthy of being called a culture in conformity with the noble destiny of man”.[28]



Friday, July 17, 2009

ABBAS HUSAIN


DIVERSITY IN TARIQAT
Abbas Husain

FIRST ISLAM SEMINAR
Diversity of Thought in Islamic Shariat, Tariqat & Culture
29th July 2007
Aiwan-e-Iqbal Complex
Lahore

[


"Nothing that can be put into words is common to all sufism" (Sufi saying)

1. Tariqat means Experience
Nothing that can be put into words is common to all Sufi Saints. Tariqat is Sufism for this conversation..language while it is a powerful medium, it is still a medium. Spirituality is Sufism. Tariqat means experience. Experience is ineffable and unspeakable so we are speaking about the unspeakable. A contradiction. We are talking about what most people are silent about so actually we are glorifying silence by talking about it! So ultimately please understand these are very personal private understanding of things and in that sense nothing that can be put into words is common to all Sufis. All great Sufi masters are dealing with experiences and that is the common point. The verbal equivalent. I intend in the following to share with you some insights on the goals, techniques and challenges of the inner path today. My own credentials are very humble: I can only speak of some grace/faiz (of suhbat and reading) that I have received (and continue to receive) from my Teachers some in this world, and some not

2. Sufism: The Spirituality of Islam
Sufism may be called the spirituality of Islam. And I know that there are powerful forces that seek to exclude it from the purview of relevance in the modern world. But if one can say that Sufism seeks to address the interior dimension of each of us, the domain of intentions and aspirations, then it is obvious that all of us need to know its teachings. We need to hear these words:

"Which of you can by taking thought add a cubit to his stature?" ---Jesus Christ

I cannot deal with the History of Sufism, nor its place in Islam, nor the way you can seek a Sheikh for yourself in modern times, nor what to do with the claims of someone who claims to be a Pir, and cure many diseases…These questions are outside of our discussion today (sorry!) My topic is Diversity in Tariqat i.e. What resources do the inner path and its teachings have to offer to deal with “the other”. Or simply put: If Sufism is essential knowledge, why are there different silsilas? So let me briefly offer some definitions of the five major orders and then offer a way of looking at them as attempts to deal with the diversity.

3. The Major Sufi Orders
The Indo Pakistan Sub-Continent has had the presence of the four major brotherhoods: With a fifth also present here but its spread has been mainly in Africa. The Chishti, The Naqshbandi, The Suhrawardi and The Qadri.




The Qadriyya Order is connected to the great saint Hazrat Abdul Qadir Jilani (RA). Insisting on the Shari’a, it offers a most vigorous set of practices that truly involve the body, mind and soul.

The Suhrawardiyya trace their lineage to Shaykh Abu Najeeb Suhrawardi. Strong on the Shari’a they follow the illumination path and seek the lights whereby the fruits of their practices may be recognized.

The Naqshbandiyya may be called the intellectual path: they offer a set of practices that are later grasped intellectually. Hazrat Bahauddin Naqshband was an intellectual giant and his teachings have left a permanent imprint on the spirituality of Central Asian region and beyond.

The Chishtiyya are famous for the music, the qawwalis, the devotional songs that many see as “outside” the Shari’a…It must be recalled that Chishti Masters have said: “If lion flesh can be declared halal to cure a sick body, what must be done for a sick heart?”

These four you may be familiar with but the fifth major order is now vastly better known for its international fame: The Shazliyya after Shaykh Abul Hasan Shazli.

4. There are as Many Paths as there are Breaths of Men
Please recall that all these impressions are simply personal…You may not agree with any or all of them…But I am making these points to get to the crux of my topic: All silsilas may be seen as responding to the great diversity of human natures. Consider this profound saying : There are as many paths as there are breaths of men.




5. Self discovery
Consider that spirituality not only recognizes variety in social class, or race, or language, or ethnicity or gender, but accepts the uniqueness of each individual human being. If the revelation of Allah is an absolute for mankind, so too is his/her revelation to Allah a sign of acceptance. Self discovery, and the remarkable tools of self knowledge offered by all the Sufi orders form therefore a priceless heritage for all mankind. And in an age where action matters, improving the world matters more than anything else,

Perhaps some of us need to heed the words of the Prophet’s great disciple Hazrat Ali (a.s.) revered by all Sufi Orders as the Fount of the Initiatic Chain:

"Man arafa nafsuhu faqad arafa rabbohu": Whoever knows himself knows his Lord.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Kamil Khan Mumtaz



The Originality of "Islamic" Art
Kamil Khan Mumtaz

Third Islam Seminar
ART OF ISLAM
2nd September 2007
Aiwan-e-Iqbal Complex, Lahore





1. The notion of "Islamic" Art
The arts of Islam are among its greatest legacies. Yet the legitimacy of the arts is today a matter of controversy in contemporary Muslim societies. The modernist rejects the religious basis of any art, and therefore the very notion of “Islamic” art, while the Islamist zealot brackets “art” with all that he sees as corrupting and satanic about “modernity” and therefore as “un-Islamic”.

Both need to be reminded that the modern definition and criteria of art, which they presume to be universal and timeless, are of relatively recent origin, a product of the Euro-centric modernity project; that there is indeed an intimate relationship between art and the traditional perspective of Islam; and that this traditional perspective is not related to time, space or material form, but to a world-view that is more than ever relevant to “our time”.

2. The Problem of Art

When the smearing of excrement on a Madonna icon, and other weird antics are presented as “art”, the definition of art question,

What is “art”?
o skill and dexterity
o beauty and aesthetics
o subjective expression

3. The Problem of the Art Historian
The art-historic method catalogues and categorizes art under distinct “styles”, defined in terms of formal characteristic, and explains the “evolution” or “development” of each style, by tracing each form to its origin, source or precursor or to its social, economic and other environmental determinants.

Thus “Islamic Art” is treated as a style characterized by such elements as geometry, non-figurative or abstract forms that are supposed to have “evolved” to circumvent the prohibition against representation of animate forms, or the “horror vaccui” of desert nomads.

4. Recognition of "Islamic" Art as "Art"?

Alternatively, “Islamic Art” is either denied recognition as “Art” on the grounds that it does not meet the criteria of originality, and creative expression of the individual artist, and is classified as “crafts” or the lesser, applied, industrial or “useful arts”, or is denied as a single category since there is little in common between the widely varied productions in time and space, and because all the elements of each regional style can be traced to non-Islamic sources.

The argument regarding the proscription of figurative art in Islam is not supported by any Qur’anic injunction, and ignores the multitude of examples of paintings and other arts depicting not only human and animal forms including prophets, birds, horses etc., but also angels, demons, dragons and other mythical beings.

5. The problem of Exclusivist
Rejection of materialist basis of modernism and hedonist nature modern art, the fundamentalist seeks to preserve the purity of his faith by excluding art altogether from Islam.

6. The problem of the Contemporary Practitioner

Given the modern definition of “Art”, the contemporary “craftsman” seeks acceptance and recognition by “modernizing Islamic art”, distorting the traditional forms and incorporating new forms to demonstrate his originality, novelty, creative expression, whereas the modern “artist” seeks legitimacy by “Islamicising modern art”, by incorporating some traditional motifs, such as geometric patterns and calligraphy.




7. Art, economy, science and philosophy
A common determinant of the economy, science and ideology in any human collectivity is its shared perception of the “real”. Art is the representation of that shared perception.

Archaeological investigations show that some half million years ago the Pothowar Plateau was inhabited by a hunting and gathering people who used rough stone tools, but did not as yet live in settled communities. They obtained all their needs of food, shelter and medicines directly from the natural environment. In this state all natural forms and phenomena were seen as the manifestation of a higher reality, or effects whose cause was a higher metaphysical Reality. There was no need to represent what was a manifest and omni-present reality. “Art”, at this stage, including the art of building, was conspicuous by its absence. The performance of ritual dances, incantations and paintings are of course well documented in hunting and gathering communities. But rituals place the performer, the subject, in the presence of the real, whereas art, as representation, places the artifice between the subject and the represented reality.

The first major change was the separation of phenomenon, as “effect”, from the higher reality as “cause”. The physical world was seen to comprise of four elements: earth, water, air and fire that manifested essential qualities. But the qualities themselves belonged to the higher cause. This “science” enabled man to engage in agriculture, animal husbandry, transportation, the production of commodities and to establish settled urban communities. In this process man saw himself as mediator between “cause” and “effect”. As “agent”, civilized man sought to reflect the qualities of the “principal” in everything he did and everything he made. Thus, in addition to utility, every object and every act reflected the qualities of beauty. Everything was “art”. As early as the third millennium BC, the layout of the Indus Valley cities and buildings in Moenjodaro and Harrappa was governed by rectangular grids and cardinal orientations. The design of major buildings, such as baths and granaries was based on axial symmetries and geometric proportions reflecting the cosmic order. Buddhist and Hindu art and architecture, including stupas and monastries of the Gandhara period at Taxila, Swat and Takht Bahi, and Hindu Shahiya Period temples on the Salt Range, expanded the vocabulary of symbolic forms, with mandalas, yantras, floral and anthropomorphic forms as representations of divine attributes. This vocabulary was assimilated into Muslim art and architecture of the Sultanate and Mughal periods in Sindh and Punjab, and charged with new meanings to communicate the Islamic concepts of unity and the qualities of the Divine as represented by “the most beautiful names”.

The second significant change that began some 500 years ago was the separation of the physical from the non-physical reality. Industrial production relied on the manipulation of the physical and chemical properties of matter. In this process all phenomena were seen to be the result of the action and reaction of matter. Thus cause and effect were seen as inherent in the properties of matter, and the laws of nature were seen to be absolute and inviolable. Nature appeared to require no external cause. However, knowledge of these laws empowered man to control nature itself. Thus Man replaced God as the center of the universe by virtue of his reason, rationality and superior intellect. In this construct, the primary “reality” was perceived as physical and material, while ideas were seen as reflections of that reality in the human mind. But reason and rationality required useful objects and acts only to fulfill physical and material criteria of utility and efficiency. Abstract aesthetic values of beauty, proportion, harmony, rhythm etc., as much as human sentiments and emotions of joy and sorrow, love and hate, had no place in the practical spheres of commerce, industry and science, which dealt with the “real” world of concrete material and physical entities. The expression of abstract ideas, values and concepts now required a new vehicle. This new vehicle was Art, “the fine Arts”, which were to be distinguished from the “useful arts” or “industrial arts” or simply the crafts. The only function of the higher or “fine” arts was the creation of Art. Art writing now emerged as a new field of academic and intellectual pursuit to document, analyze and describe this field of activity.

The third significant change that took place about sixty years ago was the awareness of a “sub-atomic” reality, a reality beyond the physical, but in the downward direction. This radically transformed our perceptions of “the Real”. Relativity had blurred the distinction between matter and energy and shown that measurements of time and space were not universal but variable relative to the observer; now quantum physics introduced another aspect of ambiguity and uncertainty; and “chaos” emerged as a natural principle. Suddenly, nature was no longer “predictable”. The “laws of nature” were now seen to be less than absolute and inviolable. These new concepts shook our confidence and certainties in our ability to know the truth. The “truth”, which was now seen as relative rather than absolute, admitted the possibility of “alternate” and multiple realities. “Pluralism”, and “ambiguity”, became the catch-phrases of post-modernism, whose favorite pastime became the “subversion of elitist icons”, and the debunking of sacred cows. Nature was found to be playing roulette. Nothing was as it appeared. Life was a game of chance. Reality was entirely subjective, in the mind. So we could “invent” and “re-invent” ourselves. This was reflected in the arts as “magic realism”, and other flights of fantasy, hedonism and extreme subjectivism.

Thus we see that Man’s awareness of the “real” has moved from the highest, metaphysical or spiritual plane, from the plane of archetypes to the plane of forms, and from this “ideal” or “imaginal” plane, to the physical, material or terrestrial plane, to the sub-physical or sub-terrestrial plane.

8. Man sought to reflect His qualities, the "Ideal" forms, in every act.
So long as all of creation was seen as the manifestation of the Real, there was no call for art or art writing. So long as man saw himself as agent, in the image of the Creator, he sought to reflect His qualities, the “ideal” forms, in every act. It was only when man replaced God as the measure of all things that he began to “create” art. And when reality was seen to be relative and subjective, the artist set out to invent his own “reality”. But this was the reality of the lower depths of the mind, the psyche.

9. “Post-colonial cultural discontinuity”
From its inception in post-renaissance Europe to the present phase of post-modernism and post-structuralism, art and art writing has been part and parcel of the modernity project. Along with “humanism” and rationalism of the renaissance, art had risen to challenge the authority of the church. The “age of reason” enlisted art in the service of the imperialist cause, with evolutionism, of carrying the white man’s burden, bringing civilization to the primitive races, who were represented as so “backward” that their culture had not yet “evolved” to the level of producing “art”.

9.1 "Art" identified with the west, modernity, progress & development
In the resulting encounter between modernity and tradition in colonial and post-colonial societies, art was identified with the west, with modernity, progress, and development, while the crafts and tradition were associated with the past, the orient, primitiveness and backwardness.

Art and art writing were used to justify and give a moral gloss to the civilizing mission of colonialism, and continue to serve global capital’s neo-imperialist mission of bringing civilization, freedom and liberalism, to the people living under the tyranny of cruel, suffocating, barbaric traditions. This mission was adopted by the post-colonial state, for whom modernization was the route to economic prosperity, and by the ruling elites who were quick to align themselves with the colonial masters.




10. Traditional View of Art
Most of us probably understand tradition in terms of the past, conventions, rituals, custom, specific to a particular place, or people, i.e. in terms of Time, Space, ethnicity and Physical form. However, in this seminar, and in this paper, we shall use the term “tradition” in the sense of a universal perspective, a “World View”, a cosmology, which transcends time, space and ethnicity as such.

Any worldview is a conceptual construct of Reality, in which we locate our selves in relation to a larger, cosmic scheme of things, and find a purpose and direction for all our actions. It is a construct of reality that gives meaning to our lives, our “raison d’etre”.

At the center of any worldview are the really big questions of Truth, Being and Existence. Existence is “being” in time and space. But Being itself is beyond and independent of time or space. And the Truth, Reality, is beyond and independent of Being.

10.1 Modernist Worldview: Existence & Traditional Worldview: Being
But since Being and the Truth are beyond “existence” in time and space, they cannot be encompassed by rational thinking or logical definitions. This problem with “being” had always worried the philosophers until the modernists declared the discussion out of bounds and decided that existence was its own sufficient cause. Thus the modernist worldview is centered on “existence”, while the “traditional” worldview is centered on “Being”.

In the traditional construct Reality, the Truth, is universal, absolute. The reflection of this truth, the ways it is perceived and described, varies from person to person, and between different cultures, in time and space. Thus the same universal truths are variously expressed in Taoism, Hinduism, Islam, Christianity and Judaism.

Table 1: Traditional Cosmology

a). Beyond Being
The Absolute

Hahut
Al Dhaat
Brahma
Brahma Nirguna
Para-Brahma Tao
Wu Chi

b). The World of the Spirit ;World of Ideas; World of Archetypes; World of Essences
Olam Haberiyah World of Domination


Godhead(the Father)
Being, Person
Relative Being
Intellect
Logos(the Son)
Spirit(Holy Ghost) Lahut
‘Alam al-Ruh
‘Alam al-Jabrut
Khaliq


Al Aqlul awwal

Ruh ul Quddus Ishwar


Brahma Siguna
Apara-Brahma

(Purusha+Prakriti
=Budhi)
Aatma T’ai I
T’ai Chi


c). The World of the Soul; World of Formation; the Subtle world; Psychic World; Macrocosm
Olam Hayetsirah World of the Dominion
Heaven



Cosmos ‘Alam al-Malakut
Aalam e Mithal
Qalam
Loh e Mahfuz
Aalam e Khayal
Barzakh
Ka’inaat
Makhluq Bhuvas

Purusha
Prakriti


Samsaar Tien

(Yang
Yin)

d). The World of the Body; Physical Universe; the Corporeal World
Olam Ha’asiyah Earth


Man
(Microcosm=
Spirit/soul/body) ‘Alam al-Mulk wal-
Shahadah
Duniyah Bhu

Maya Ti


Jen


10.2 Macrocosm & Microcosm
In this construct, the macrocosm comprises of a hierarchical series of layers which can be broadly grouped into three worlds, planes or dimensions: the earthly world of matter, bound by space and time, this is the world of quantity, which we experience here below; above this is the intermediate world of the heavens, the “imaginal” plane or the world of forms; and above that the “ideal” plane, the spiritual or angelic world, the world of the archetypes, of the essences or qualities and of pure Being. These levels correspond in the human microcosm to the body, the soul and the spirit.

10.3 Components of the traditional design method
Two essential components of the traditional design method and design theories are proportioning and the use of “ideal forms”. The system of proportional sub-division, as a method for determining size and shape rather than relying on an absolute or fixed measure such as a foot or a yard, has been documented by several scholars . But proportions alone do not determine form. All spatial relationships are proportionate, and several systems of proportions have been found to have been used for the same type, category or genre of objects. Indeed, a particular set of proportions may apply equally to a man, an animal or a tree. Proportions apply to specific forms. Every traditional artifact has a predetermined essential typology, a prototype, a generic or “ideal” form. Needless to say, no two objects of the same type or genre are in fact identical. A single form may be “manifested” in an infinite variety of scales, proportions, and details of construction and decorations while “being” essentially a mandala, yantra, or hashtbihisht . This diversity is due to the specific materials, user requirements, climate and other conditions. Nevertheless, the work of the designer, the architect, master or apprentice, begins with copying from a pre-existing model.

10.4 The importance of copying
To understand the importance of copying, both as a method of design, and as a method of instruction, it is necessary to understand the central place of “ideal forms” in the traditional theory of aesthetics, and the creative process within the traditional world-view and cosmology, which is centered on the relationship between Man, Being and Manifestation.

10.5 Arts & Crafts
Traditionally the term “art” includes all the arts and crafts. In fact it is applied to making or doing anything that meets the dual criteria of utility and beauty. Now utility - appropriateness to function and purpose - relates to quantity and the more obvious practical and physical aspects of material and form. But beauty relates to quality, and is traditionally understood as a quality of the Divine. In the traditional cosmology, all creation, everything in the created universe, is a manifestation of the Divine. In the creative process, the attributes and qualities of the Divine are reflected first as archetypes on the plane of the Spirit or the ideal plane, then as pure forms on the imaginal plane, and finally as natural and man-made objects and acts on the earthly plane. However, some objects and acts are more “transparent”, that is, the ideal forms are more readily recognized in them than in others which are more “opaque”. For example, qualities such as proportion, harmony, balance, symmetry etc. are more readily recognized in certain mathematical relationships, in music and other works of art. Similarly, a human form, or a tree or a sunset, may strike us as “perfect” because it corresponds with our idea of a “perfect” man, or woman or tree etc. Indeed every earthly object, artifice or act, takes on a symbolic meaning to the extent that it reflects its heavenly archetype .

10.6 Insan-e-Kamil
The “perfected Man” / Insan e Kamil, the fully realized man, is a mirror that reflects all of the qualities, that is, absolute Being; This is his essential nature, his true self, and the potential within every human. But we are veiled from the knowledge of the Real by the phenomenal world, and we are veiled from our true Self by our animal desires . To realize his potential man must recover his lost nature, his primordial nature made in the image of God but which he lost at the fall. It is when his human nature recovers its original wholeness that access to the Spirit, the Eye of the Heart becomes possible. He must undertake an inward journey from the body, through the soul to the heart. For it is the “heart” that is the seat of the Spirit. Only when the “eye of the heart” is opened can it contemplate “the Real” and “gain sight of the light of God”.

10.7 Progress & Development = Journey towards "enlightenment"
Traditional man measured human “development” in terms of the “progress” made on this journey towards “enlightenment". The role of art, in traditional societies, has been to act as support in this spiritual quest or journey, by reminding us of our role and function in this life, by pointing to our true goal and by illuminating the way to that goal.

Within this framework the artist or craftsman cannot presume to be “original” (except in the sense of returning to the origin), or to “create” beauty. Beauty already exists, out there, as an objective reality. He can only aspire to reflect it in his work. But how can he reflect a heavenly archetype that by definition lies beyond this sensible world, the phenomenal world of matter, space and time?

10.8 Art through a Chain of Masters
To begin with, every artist or craftsman acquires his art or craft skill from a recognized master. The master in turn, invariably traces the source of his art through a chain of masters, to a divinely inspired source - a prophet, a saint, a sage or a great master who was both skilled in his art and spiritually enlightened. But none of these sources claim to be the originators or creators of the art in question, only to have been the vehicles or recipients of these gifts from the Divine Spirit. This is why the great classical forms in every traditional art and craft are held in such veneration and esteem. They are handed down from master to apprentice, from generation to generation. These forms are copied by students, not only as a means of perfecting their technical skills, but also as a means of purifying the spirit or acquiring a special blessing. They are used by professionals as exemplars, points of reference, guiding framework or grounds for their own work.

10.9 A Language of Symbols
The ideal forms, in themselves, their components and embellishments, can be read as a language of symbols whose meanings may be implicit, as in architectonic elements, in geometric patterns, floral or other natural motifs, or explicit as in the case of iconographic sculpture and painting but, in Islamic art and architecture, more often in calligraphy.

The Islamic Perspective
Ayat: sign or symbol
Figurative and non figurative Art
The lesser arts: allegory, metaphor
The higher arts: geometry, calligraphy

Man, Being and manifestation
The relationship between Man, Being and manifestation in Islam is best illustrated by the hadith qudsi, a related tradition in which God speaks on the tongue of the Prophet:

Kunto kanzan makhfiyyan fa-ahbabto an u‘rifa fa-khalaqtul khalq le-u‘rifa.” (I was a Hidden Treasure and I loved to be known, and so I created the world that I might be known).

“I was a hidden treasure”, that is, non-manifest, Absolute Being, or All Possibility;
“I loved to be known”, that is, to be manifest;
“I created the world”, that is, manifestation, or the physical, material cosmos;
“So that I might be known”. In other words, the purpose of the creation of the cosmos is to manifest the qualities, the attributes of the Creator.
Now the Qur’anic account of the creation of Man tells us that God made his body of clay, then blew into him of His own Spirit, and taught him the names of every thing. That is, Man is both earthly body and Divine Spirit. He has both a lower, animal self and a higher angelic Self. And while everything in the created universe manifests or reflects some quality of the Creator, only Man “knows” the names of every thing. That is, only Man, potentially, knows the cosmos, manifests or reflects all of the qualities.
Thus the function of Man in the created universe is to know, to reflect the qualities of the Divine, the Creator, who is none other than the higher Self.

Ihsan: doing what is beautiful
The central place of beauty in Islam is illustrated by the hadith of Gabriel according to which the archangel appeared in the presence of the Companions in the form of a man and asks the Prophet about Islam, Iman and Ihsan,

“Now tell me about doing what is beautiful (ihsan)”
He replied, “Doing what is beautiful means that you should worship God as if you see Him, for even if you do not see Him, He sees you.”

When he had gone, the Prophet informed his companions that the man was Gabriel, and that “he had come to teach you your religion.”

11. How can we worship God as if we see Him?
The borrowings from local non-Islamic sources, together with adaptations and modifications necessitated by the specifics of climate, materials and cultural norms, certainly result in the characteristics that distinguish each regional expression. Yet there is a unifying thread, a subtle quality that infuses the diversity of Islamic arts and architectures. This quality derives largely from the treatment of the form or object as signifier, in relation to the content or concept as the thing signified. Thus where other traditions may treat the object as allegory or metaphor, and “realize” or concretize the metaphysical content in the form of anthropomorphic and naturalistic representations, Islamic art and architecture treats the object as sign or symbol, and “idealizes” or abstracts the floral and other natural forms,

11.1 Geometry
Geometry plays an integral part in the design of Sufi shrines, not only in determining the proportions of the building in plan, section and elevation, but also in decorative details such as the curvilinear arabesques and polygonal girah patterns. The geometric patterns, called girah or knots, are made up of lines interwoven into nets or webs of constantly changing forms. The spaces between the lines appear now as pattern and now as ground, adding another layer ambiguity and paradox in the relationship between the apparent, zahir, and the hidden, batin, between simplicity and complexity. This unveiling or unfolding of the same truth at each level is experienced as one moves towards and through the structures.

Thus every form, proportion and decorative scheme becomes a ground for contemplation of higher realities. Each design is contained by a frame that establishes a finite universe, reflecting a cosmos created in perfect balance, in perfect harmony, made up of a diversity of elements governed by symmetry and proportion, with a unique center, the origin, to which everything must return. On closer examination, each element turns out to be a microcosmic representation of the larger scheme, with its own frame containing a symmetrical arrangement of elements and a unique centre. This is not merely a mechanical tool for setting out buildings and decorating surfaces, but is profoundly connected with the metaphysics of the ‘sacred’ sciences of number and geometry.

The Akhwan al-Safa, or the Brotherhood of Purity was a group of “anonymous scholars in the fourth/tenth century who produced a compendium of the arts and sciences in fifty-two epistles. This they published for all to read and it contained a virtual condensation of all knowledge of the time. They placed the science of numbers at the root of all the sciences, ‘…the foundation of wisdom, the source of knowledge and pillar of meaning.’

11.2 Active Intellect & Universal Soul& Knowledge of the essence of the soul
“Know, brother, that the Creator, most exalted, created as the first thing from His light of unity the simple substance [al-jawhar al basit] called the Active Intellect [‘aql] – as 2 is generated from one by repetition. Then the Universal Soul was generated from the light of the Intellect as 3 is generated by adding unity to 2. Then the hyle was generated by the motion of the Soul as 4 is generated by adding unity to 3.”

“Know, oh brother … that the study of sensible geometry leads to skill in all the practical arts, while the study of intelligible geometry leads to skill in the intellectual arts because this science is one of the gates through which we move to the knowledge of the essence of the soul, and that is the root of all knowledge …”

11.3 The Word; Calligraphy
But the most efficient vehicle for the communication of this knowledge is the word, spoken, as in the recitation of the Qur’an, or written, as in calligraphy. The superiority of calligraphy over representational art is discussed in some detail by Abul Fazal, the court historian of Akbar the Great, in the section on the painting studios in the A’een e Akbari .

An impression of the possessor of the form is found in the image. And an assessment of reality is gained from this impression. The letters and words are known through the shape of the line, and meaning is discerned from the letter and the word.

Although the likeness of the body is drawn in the picture, which is well known, and the European artists enable the spectators to roam the cloisters of reality, by bringing forth strange and wondrous forms in innumerable creative manners and styles, so that the eye is deceived into taking the likeness for the real. But writing has a far loftier and superior status because it informs us of the experiences of ancient masters, and the intellect and understanding is developed by this intimacy…

11.4 The Celestial Traveller
The best form of illustration is calligraphy. …Those who are attracted by outer appearances only, regard the written word as a black form, but those who can discern the truth understand it as a lamp of discernment.

It is true that it is darkness, but hidden and radiant in this darkness are thousands of luminous torches. In fact it is absolutely correct to say that near the mole of the immature eye is a brilliant chandelier.

It is an imprint of the Divine handiwork, a product from the domain of truth and spirituality. It is a night in which the sun is radiant and manifest. It is a dark cloud from which are raining radiant and brilliant pearls. It is the treasure of sight and the secret chamber of reality. It is a strange and wonderful talisman that speaks in a world of silence
It is static, but has the power of motion. It is an untilled field, but is a seeker on the path of heavenward flight.

Its reality is that of a beam from the divine torch of knowledge that falls on the articulate soul. The heart conveys this beam to the imaginal world, which is intermediate between the abstract and the material worlds, so that the abstract may establish a relationship with the material, and an absolute entity may become accustomed to the bonds of confinement.

After this stage the beam descends from the celestial imaginal world to the heart, and comes from the heart to the tongue, and from the tongue enters the ear through the air, and after this, freeing itself from material ties one after the other, returns to its real center.

Sometimes it so happens that this celestial traveler is aided by the fingertips to tour the land and sea of pen and ink, and having completed its excursion, is brought down to the parlor of the page of white paper.

This celestial guest flies off to the higher world by way of the eyes, leaving its footprint on the sheets of paper.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

THE 6th & 7th ISLAM SEMINAR: THE RELIGION & CULTURE DEBATE


6th Islam Seminar:


How Does Religion Relate to Culture?
Theoretical Issues

Saturday 15th August
Banquet Hall, Aiwan-e-Iqbal Complex,
Egerton Road, Lahore
Seminar Schedule:


Moderator: Dr. Basit Koshul

3:30 - 4:00 pm Registration

Session 1

4:00 – 4:40 pm
Religion and Culture: Contours of the Debate
Dr. Ejaz Akram, Associate Prof., LUMS, Lahore

4:40 pm - 5:20 pm
Meeting of the Twain (East & West): History,
Lessons and Significance
Dr. Basit Koshul, Associate Prof., LUMS, Lahore

Tea & Prayer break 5:20 - 5:50 pm

Session 2

5:50 - 6:30 pm
The Shari’ah Vision of Culture: Explaining the
Relationship between ‘urf and Islamic Law
Mushtaq Ahmad, Assistant Prof., Shariah & Law, Islamic Research Institute, Islamabad


6:45 - 7:30 pm Interactive Panel Discussion





7th Islam Seminar:
Historical & Practical Paradigms

Sunday 16th August
Banquet Hall, Aiwan-e-Iqbal Complex,
Egerton Road, Lahore


Moderator: Dr. Basit Koshul

3:30 - 4:00 pm Registration

Session 1

4:00 – 4:15
Explaining the Context (Moderator)
Summary from Day 1, Overview of Day 2

4:15 – 4:55 am
Unity of Religion and Culture - in Adab Traditions
Ahmad Javid, Principal Iqbal Scholar, Iqbal Academy Pakistan, Lahore

4:55am - 5:35 pm
The Relationship of Religion & Art in Islamic Culture
Taimoor Khan Mumtaz, Architect, Lahore

Tea- break 5:35 - 6:00 pm

Session 2

6:00 - 6:40 pm
Politicization of Women in Islamic Cultures:
Competing Conceptions of Freedom and Justice

Syed Rizwan Zamir, PhD Candidate, Religious
Studies,University of Virginia, USA


6:40 - 7:30 pm Interactive Panel Discussion